Knowing the components of ECONOMIC education provides the dynamic background of education in this field. The aim of the current research is to investigate the indicators and components of the ECONOMIC education curriculum. The approach of the current research is qualitative and its method is research synthesis. The research community is all the articles (211 articles) that have been presented from 1390 to 1401 AD and from 2010 to 2022 AD regarding ECONOMIC education in curricula. The sample of the research is 32 articles, which were selected based on thematic monitoring, theoretical data saturation, and purposefully. The research data were collected from the qualitative analysis of the studied articles. By analyzing the data, the dimensions of vitality in the curriculum of the elementary school in 4 factors and 55 categories including the dimension of individual factors (including indicators and components related to personality characteristics); The dimension of culture and ECONOMIC ethics (ECONOMIC fields in the society); The dimension of ECONOMIC concepts and knowledge (indices in ECONOMIC education) and the dimension of collective and communication concepts (communication and interaction indicators in education) were classified. ECONOMIC education is dependent on internal and external components in educational systems, which requires macro-planning in this field.

In this paper, resilience of an ECONOMIC system is measured by an overall index, based on the Borman et al. index, for the period of 1996-2013. The results are then compared with Briguglio index. To measure the final index, the first step is to make variables have a similar direction. The second step is normalization of variables that their values reside between zero and one. In the last step we calculate the weighted average of variables. The value of Resilience Index is between zero and one. The closer the index to zero, the less resilient will be the ECONOMIC system. In versus, The closer the index to one, the more resilient the economy. The results show that resilience was low during whole the period under consideration. Resilience reached its peak in 2001, because the budget deficit and inflation rate were reduced and governance has been improved. Then the trend started to decline. The Resilience index reached its minimum level after year 2007. According to the indeces, the main reasons were governance and market efficiency indeces.